Were the demands correct or not?
A friend also asked me for an
opinion. Tell me, shouldn't we talk about freedom for women's rights?
I said that it is easier to
decide than to think carefully before making a decision. So we have to consider
this and know that
(1) When and how did things start?
(2) What will be the
consequences?
If we look at history, we will
see that until the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, there were no such ideas
in the West, that is, even there, guidance for a living was taken from religion.
But due to many wrong decisions of the state and the church, people began to
feel that they were not being treated well. Even the most severe punishments
were meted out to scientists who came up with new ideas of science, which led
to the rapid spread of anti-religious ideas in the West. Even anti-religious
enlightenment ideas began to spread. Moreover, a pastor like Martin Luther
himself introduced a new sect, Protestantism, a secularist ideology contrary to
the traditional teachings of religion.
With this new wave of thought,
religion became such a private matter in the West that an individual was free
to practice religion in his own right, but was deprived of doing so in his
home, society and state. That is, if the father himself considers it haraam to
drink alcohol, it is his freedom not to drink, but he cannot forbid his son,
nor can he try to close any bar in the society. Now when the son or daughter
comes home drunk at night, it has become a private matter. The father has no
authority to say anything.
This ideology is actually the
basic ideology of freedom in the West, in which everyone can live as he pleases
and decide what is wrong or sinful to do and what is right to do. It is as if
every human being has attained the status of God. So now man will go his own
way, not God's will. This idea was accepted in all developed countries. That is
why today in these countries there are legal centres for adultery and gambling,
pubs and other such facilities, which is also against the teachings of the majority
religion, such as Christianity. But neither the pastor's advice is taken there
nor any pastor is given the right to campaign against all these evils.
So there was a conclusion that is not correct for any religion. For example, sex toys and animal centres are also available. To get married, a man can legally marry a man of his own sex, ie a man and a woman, and can also have sex with someone from a school-age without marriage. The woman has been given the right to legally write her name in place of the child's father so that there is no need to look for the father's name after belonging to many men. Thus, marriage has been made a shameful and unmarried relationship a proud one.
This freedom is not only for
women, it is for all, it is just a condition to be anti-religious. That is, the
West avenged the mistakes and oppression of the state and the church in such a
way that now, whether individual life or social or state laws, all have been
made anti-religious. That is why in the past, US President Obama, while
addressing the UN General Assembly, openly said that if anyone in the US set
fire to the Holy Quran, it was his right to freedom. They do not need to have a
lamp, but they should have the same freedom in their country. Similarly, when
insults were drawn in France, the French president, instead of apologizing,
backed the practice, saying it was a matter of "freedom of speech."
In short, women have enjoyed
similar freedoms in the West, and philosophers there have called for more. For
example, Deleuze said that where is the freedom now, there is still a
difference between Muharram and non-Muharram, that is, siblings do not have the
freedom to marry each other. In some countries, women are campaigning for a
legal right to prostitution, as men often do not pay after spending the night.
Thus, after the concept of
independence of the said Western society, now the same right of freedom is
being demanded in the streets in Pakistan as well. That is why in the recent
Islamabad Women's March, the flag of France, where cartoons on blasphemy were
made, was also hoisted.
In our country too, the women and
men affected by the aforementioned freedom of the West are demanding such
freedom.
Now, with this background, we can
easily decide whether we should support or fully condemn the participants in
this march.
0 Comments
if you have any doubts, please let me know